Voters will have the opportunity to cast ballots in critical races in the Golden State during The halfway point of 2022 is approaching on November 8.
When is the deadline to register to vote?
With the November 8th election less than fifteen days away, those who still want to register must complete voter registration on the same day. Once this form has been submitted, those wishing to vote must apply for a ballot at the regional election office or the nearest polling station. Direct questions to the regional election office.
Will I be emailed the vote?
All registered voters in the state should receive a ballot that can be filled out and mailed. However, those who have recently registered may not receive their ballot and time and should indicate their polling place in order to cast their vote.
Ballots must be postmarked on election day or delivered to a mailbox or brought to the polling station by 8:00 p.m. on election day.
California leadership races
Elections at the federal level
With districts, all congressional races take place in new districts. This can present some problems for incumbents who represent part of their previous district, but also for new residents who may not be as familiar with their work and political positions.
Special and regular elections for the US Senate
The 2022 special election to fill Vice President Kamala Harris’ seat will be held at the same time as the normal Senate race to represent the state starting in January 2023 for the next six years.
When President Biden won the 2020 election, Governor Gavin Newsom appointed Alex Padilla to fill the now vacant seat of Vice President Kamala Harris. Padilla, who previously served as California secretary of state, is expected to win both races. Padilla will face Republican challenger and attorney Mark P. Meuser.
There are a total of six ballot initiatives that residents will have the opportunity to vote on.
Proposition 1: Constitutional right to reproductive freedom
California voters have a chance to add an amendment enshrining the right to abortion to the state constitution. A YES vote would enshrine the right to abortion and the use of contraception in the state constitution, while a NO vote would leave the document unchanged. The initiative is supported by both the California Democratic Party and Planned Parenthood, and is opposed by the California Republican Party.
Proposition 26: Allows personal roulette, dice games and sports betting on tribal lands.
There are several propositions on the ballot this year that deal with state gambling laws. Prop 26 would allow legal sports betting at the state’s four racetracks as well as tribal casinos. In addition to sports betting, tribal casinos could also offer roulette and other dice games, which are currently prohibited by state law. A YES vote allows these changes to be made, while a NO vote would keep the gambling laws the same.
Support for Prop 26 cuts across political lines, with the California Democratic Party endorsing the measure and believing it could be a way to increase tribal sufficiency. The California Republican Party is being joined by an unlikely ally in their opposition to Prop 26 sections of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and local humane societies. Animal advocates see Prop 26 as a means to breathe new life into the declining horse racing industry and any effort to make horse racing more profitable.
Prop 27: Allows online and mobile sports betting outside of tribal lands
This is the second of two proposals related to gambling.
In 2018, the US Supreme Court gave states the power to determine their own laws in relation to online sports betting. Many states quickly passed laws allowing online sports betting as a way to increase their own tax revenue. In California, the two largest online sports betting platforms, Draft Kings and FanDuel, have invested millions in a campaign to legalize betting in the Golden State.
A measure to legalize sports betting for people 20 and older outside of tribal lands would raise revenue because “those who offer online sports betting would have to pay the state a share of the sports bets placed.”
Unlike Prop 26, where Democrats and Republicans have differing views, on Prop 27, neither side agrees that the measure should be approved by voters. The only organizations that approve of its implementation are DraftKings, FanDuel, Major League Baseball, and three tribal tribes (fifty others oppose the proposal).
Prop 28: Provides additional funding for art and music education in public schools
Prop 28 moves away from the world of gambling and instead focuses on funding arts and music programs in K-12 schools. If approved, voters would allow the state to increase education funding by one percent (the funds could only be used for arts and music education) using the state’s General Fund, which has a surplus of about $100 billion. Current state law mandates that all students, regardless of their district, receive some arts education, but the quality can vary widely, and some districts allocate much more money to these programs. Funding for Prop 28 would be distributed to districts that don’t have the funds to improve their arts and music programs, making access to these subjects more equitable across the state.
A YES vote means the person approves this funding increase, while a NO vote would keep funding at the current level.
Prop 28 was endorsed by the California Democratic Party and interestingly there are no organizations that have spoken out against the measure.
Prop 29: Requires a licensed physician on-site at kidney dialysis clinics and establishes other state requirements
Prop 29, which deals with staffing at kidney dialysis clinics, is similar to those voted on in 2018 and 2020. The measure would mandate that clinics have at least one physician, nurse or medical assistant on site to administer treatment. .
Supporters believe the change could reduce patient hospitalizations, while opponents believe the increased staffing is an unnecessary expense that could put many private dialysis clinics out of business.
The YES campaign is supported by the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West, the California Labor Federation and the California Democratic Party.
The NO campaign was funded by private dialysis companies such as DeVita and Fresenius Medical Care, and also found support from the California Republican Party, the American Nurses Association and the California Medical Association.
Prop 30: Provides funding for air pollution reduction and wildfire prevention programs by raising personal income taxes over $2 million
Electric cars continue to gain popularity in the Golden State, and Prop 30 would spur further demand for gas-guzzling cars by imposing a 1.75 percent income tax increase on those making more than $2 million a year. The funds raised, which the state estimates could be as much as $4.5 billion, would be used to provide rebates to low- and middle-class families who buy electric cars and expand charging infrastructure. About a quarter of the revenue would also be used to hire and train fighters, which are desperately needed as the fire season grows longer and longer.
The basis of support for this proposal is a bit odd. While the proposal was supported by the California Democratic Party, Gov. Gavin Newsom opposes the tax increase, along with the state Republican Party and the California Teachers Association.
Prop 31: Referendum on a 2020 bill that would ban the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products
The last and final proposal on this year’s ballot concerns state laws on the availability of certain tobacco products. Prop 31 was put on the ballot after opposing the implementation of a state law that banned the commercialization of tobacco products with flavors that appeal to children, including mango and cotton candy. A YES vote means the voter would like to see these products banned, while a NO vote means they wish to reverse the 2020 law and allow these products to be sold.