2022 midterm elections: What you need to know to vote in California

Voters will have the opportunity to cast ballots in critical races in the Golden State during The halfway point of 2022 is approaching on November 8.

When is the deadline to register to vote?

Since the election is less than fifteen days away, those who still want to register must fill out a voter registration form on the same day. After submitting this form, those who wish to vote must request a ballot from the regional election office or the nearest polling station. Any remaining questions about the registration process should be directed to the regional election office.

Will I be emailed the vote?

All registered voters in the state should receive a ballot that can be filled out and returned by mail or dropped in a collection box. However, those who registered recently may not receive their ballot and time should determine their polling place in order to cast their vote.

Ballots must be postmarked on election day or delivered to a mailbox or brought to the polling station by 8:00 p.m. on election day.

California leadership races





Insurance Commissioner

Elections at the federal level

Thanks to the districts, all congressional races are in new districts. This may pose some problems for incumbents who represent part of their previous district, but also new residents who may not be as familiar with their work and political positions.

Special and regular elections for the US Senate

Special choices to fulfill Vice President Kamala Harris seat through 2022 will be held at the same time as the normal Senate race to determine who will represent the state beginning in January 2023 for another six years.

When President Biden won the 2020 election, Governor Gavin Newsom appointed Alex Padilla to serve in the seat vacated by Vice President Kamala Harris. Padilla, who previously served as California Secretary of Statee, he is expected to win both races. Padilla will face Republican challenger and attorney Mark P. Meuser.

Ballot initiatives

There are a total of six ballot initiatives that residents will have the opportunity to vote on.

Proposition 1: Constitutional right to reproductive freedom

California voters have the option to add amendment enshrining the right to abortion in the state constitution. A YES vote would enshrine the right to abortion and the use of contraception in the state constitution, while a NO vote would leave the document unchanged. The initiative is supported by both the California Democratic Party and Planned Parenthood, and is opposed by the California Republican Party.

Proposition 26: Allows personal roulette, dice games and sports betting on tribal lands.

There are several propositions on the ballot this year that deal with state gambling laws.

Prop 26 would legalize sports betting at the state’s four racetracks as well as tribal casinos. In addition to sports betting, tribal casinos could also handle it offer roulette and other dice games that are currently prohibited by state law. A YES vote allows these changes to be made, while a NO vote would keep the gambling laws the same.

Support for Prop 26 cuts across party lines, with the California Democratic Party endorsing the measure, believing that this could be a way to increase tribal sufficiency.

An unlikely ally joins the California Republican Party in opposition to Prop 26, Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals as well as various local humane societies. Animal rights activists see Prop 26 as a means to breathe new life into the declining horse racing industry and oppose any efforts to make horse racing more profitable.

Prop 27: Allows online and mobile sports betting outside of tribal lands

This is the second of two proposals related to gambling.

In 2018, the US Supreme Court gave states the power to determine their own laws in relation to online sports betting. Many states quickly passed laws allowing online sports betting as a way to increase their own tax revenue.

Two of the largest online sports betting platforms, Draft Kings and FanDuelthey spent millions on the campaign legalize gambling in the Golden State.

A measure to legalize sports betting for people in their twenties outside of tribal lands would increase revenue by “those offering online sports betting would be required to pay the state a share of the sports bets made.”

Unlike Prop 26, where Democrats and Republicans have differing views, on Prop 27, both parties disagree that the measure should be approved by voters. The only organizations that approve of its implementation are DraftKings, FanDuel, Major League Baseball, and three tribal tribes (fifty others oppose the proposal).

Prop 28: Provides additional funding for art and music education in public schools

Prop 28 moves away from the world of gambling and instead focuses on funding arts and music programs in K-12 schools.

If approved, voters would allow the state to increase funding for education by one percent (funds could only be used for arts and music education) from the state’s General Fund which has a surplus of around 100 billion dollars. Current state law mandates that all students, regardless of district, receive some arts education, but the quality can vary widely, with some districts allocating much more money to these programs. Funding for Prop 28 would be distributed to districts that don’t have the funds to improve their arts and music programs, making access to these subjects more equitable across the state.

A YES vote means the person approves this funding increase, while a NO vote would keep funding at the current level.

Prop 28 was passed California Democratic Party and the interesting thing is that they exist no organizations that spoke against the measure.

Prop 29: Requires a licensed physician on-site at kidney dialysis clinics and establishes other state requirements

Prop 29, which deals with the staffing of kidney dialysis clinics, is similar to those that have been in 2018 and 2020 they voted against. The measure would mandate that clinics have at least one doctor, nurse or medical assistant on site to administer the treatment.

Supporters believe the change could reduce hospitalizations for patients, while those opposed they believe the increase in staff is an unnecessary expense that could put many privately owned dialysis clinics out of business.

The YES campaign is supported by Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers WestCalifornia Federation of Labor and California Democratic Party.

The NO campaign was funded by private dialysis companies, e.g DeVita and Fresenius Medical Careand also found support from the California Republican Party, the American Nurses Association, and the California Medical Association.

Prop 30: Provides funding for air pollution reduction and wildfire prevention programs by raising personal income taxes over $2 million

Electric cars continue to gain popularity in the Golden State, and Prop 30 would spur further demand zero-emission cars by imposing a 1.75 percent income tax increase on those earning more than $2 million a year. The funds raised, which the state estimates could total $4.5 billion, would be used provide discounts to low- and middle-class families who purchase electric cars and expand charging infrastructure. About a quarter of the revenue would also be used for hiring and training fighters who are desperately needed as the fire season gets longer and longer.

The basis of support for this proposal is a bit odd. While the proposal was supported by the California Democratic Party, Gov. Gavin Newsom opposes the tax increase, along with the state Republican Party and the California Teachers Association.

Prop 31: Referendum on a 2020 bill that would ban the retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products

The last and final proposal on this year’s ballot concerns state laws on the availability of certain tobacco products. Prop 31 was placed on the ballot after opposition to implementation of a state law that banned the marketing of tobacco products with flavors that appeal to children, including mango and cotton candy. A YES vote means the voter would like to see these products banned, while a NO vote means they wish to reverse the 2020 law and allow these products to be sold.


Leave a Comment